Summary
Decentralized architecture and cryptographic protections of blockchain combine to create a much safer system than conventional banking.
Introduction
Banks, with their centralized systems and rules, have long been associated with financial security. Blockchain technology, first developed for Bitcoin, now challenges the security dominance of traditional banking by providing a decentralized alternative with transparency, immutable records, and cryptography. Daniel Simon, the Investment Director at Northern Markets, believes that the way blockchain is set up might give it an edge over traditional banking systems when it comes to security.
The Foundations of Blockchain Security
By recording transactions across a network of computers as opposed to a single central authority, blockchain functions as a distributed ledger. Every transaction creates an irreversible chain by forming a “block” that is connected to the one before it. Because banks are frequently the target of hackers, this configuration ensures that there isn’t a single point of failure. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) reports that cybercrime has cost the banking industry about $12 billion in losses over the last two decades.
But here’s the interesting part: the way blockchain is designed makes it really tough for unauthorized users to change anything in the network. They would need to own more than 51% of it, and any changes also need to be approved by many different nodes first. This is considered impracticable for large-scale systems such as Bitcoin, which handled $19 trillion in transactions in 2024.
Blockchain is further strengthened by cryptography. Public and private keys ensure that only authorized parties can access or modify data. Blockchain distributes data among thousands of nodes, in contrast to banks, where a hacked central server might reveal enormous datasets (as was the case with the 2019 Capital One hack that affected 106 million users). Its structural robustness was shown by a 2024 Chainalysis research that reported $1.7 billion in cryptocurrency losses, mostly due to exchange hacks and DeFi attacks rather than fundamental blockchain problems.
Banks and Their Security Challenges
To safeguard money, traditional banks use physical infrastructure, centralized databases, and many levels of regulatory supervision. While these systems demonstrate effectiveness, they are not without flaws. Data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the IBM Cyber Security Intelligence Index reveal that phishing remains a significant vulnerability. Specifically, the IBM report indicates that 41% of security incidents in 2023 were attributed to phishing attacks.
Encryption, firewalls, multi-factor authentication, and stringent restrictions are just a few of the security methods that banks employ. Still, the way banking is set up makes it vulnerable. Entire networks can be compromised by a single successful attack, as demonstrated by the 2016 SWIFT system breach that led to the theft of $81 million from the Bangladesh Bank heist. By spreading risk, blockchain’s distributed architecture lessens the effect of a single failure.
Transparency and Immutability Enhance Trust
Blockchain’s transparency is an additional advantage. Every transaction is entered into a publicly accessible ledger that is open to audit. Data cannot be changed once it is added to the blockchain, making it impossible for anybody to change the transaction history. Being open about things helps lower the chances of internal fraud, a big issue for banks.
The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) found that between January 2022 and September 2023, banks and financial institutions lost a massive $3.1 billion to this kind of fraud. This information came from 1,921 real fraud instances that were looked at all around the world. Such fraudulent operations are less likely to occur due to the blockchain’s transparent structure, which enables real-time transaction tracking and verification.
Scalability and Adoption
The security advantages of blockchain depend on its adoption and scalability. By January 2025, nearly 90% of big banks in the U.S. and Europe were looking into blockchain tech, according to industry reports. For example, JPMorgan’s Onyx platform processed a huge $1 trillion in tokenized assets. These private blockchains tweak the technology for financial needs, striking a balance between security and privacy—an important factor since public blockchains show all their data to everyone. In contrast, public networks such as Ethereum and Bitcoin managed 51.7 million transactions in December 2024 alone, demonstrating their ability to scale under high traffic volumes.
Banks are having a tough time trying to combine blockchain technology with their existing systems. A recent trial by the World Bank in 2024, working together with the Swiss National Bank and SIX Digital Exchange, successfully launched a CHF 200 million digital bond. However, it showed that there are still some difficulties in making Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) more widely used.
Practical and Regulatory Aspects
Regulation shapes the security landscape for both systems. Banks operate under strict frameworks like Basel III, ensuring stability but sometimes stifling innovation. Despite being less regulated, blockchain is coming under increasing scrutiny. The European Central Bank said in 2024 that stablecoins were responsible for a sizable amount of the financial stability concerns associated with cryptocurrencies, with uncontrolled stablecoins presenting unique difficulties. Calls for thorough supervision have increased as a result. Although blockchain offers both freedom and danger, its decentralized structure makes enforcement more difficult.
Conclusion
Blockchain technology offers a strong substitute for conventional banking systems as financial security risks grow more complex. Its decentralized architecture, immutability, transparency, and cryptographic security provide important benefits for protecting transactions and private information. Blockchain represents a fundamental leap in financial system security, not merely a technical advancement, claims Daniel Simon. Blockchain’s built-in security characteristics make it a safer and more robust system for the future, even if traditional institutions still play a significant part in the global economy.
Important Notice: The content of this article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered a recommendation. The author bears no responsibility for any actions taken by the company during your trading journey. It’s important to acknowledge that the information contained in this article may not be entirely accurate or current. Your trading and financial decisions are entirely your responsibility, and it is vital not to solely depend on the information presented here. We make no guarantees about the accuracy of the information on this platform and disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from your trading or investment decisions.
